David Potts on Derrida's "Of Grammatology"
The following is a summary of Derrida’s thought as presented in Part I, Chapter 1, of his book Of Grammatology. This book is apparently the
2011年2月28日
|
6分
¡Únete a nuestro boletín!
X
The following is a summary of Derrida’s thought as presented in Part I, Chapter 1, of his book Of Grammatology. This book is apparently the
ウィル・トーマスのレビュー・エッセイは、この非常に難しいデリダ作品のエッセンスの多くを捉えています。私は特に、デコンに関する彼のコメントを高く評価した。
I was quite impressed with David L. Potts’s review of Foucault, as I was impressed with the criticisms he raised against my own discussion..
The first impulse a reader is likely to have upon starting to read chapter 10 is to close the book in dismay and disgust. The sentences appe
In his outstanding review essay , Roger Donway makes several references to things’ identities being “artificial.” By this he seems to mean
この解説は、アトラス・ソサエティが1999年に開催したオンラインセミナー「サイバーセミナー」の一部で、「ポストモダニズムの大陸的起源」と題されています。
ミシェル・フーコーが『セクシュアリティの歴史』で述べたことを正しく解釈するために。HSI, Vintage Books, 1990; 初版はこちら
この解説は、アトラス・ソサエティが1999年に開催したオンラインセミナー「サイバーセミナー」の一部で、「ポストモダニズムの大陸的起源」と題されています。
I want to lay out what I understand to be the basic structure of the argument, along the way dealing with some misunderstandings to which
Bryan suggested that we might find his reading of “What Is Metaphysics?” too Sartrean; I confess I did find it so. I was particularly
Contrary to logical positivism, the cognitive meaning of a statement is not equal to its means of verification. Instead, the meaning of a...
Humanism is the doctrine that there is only the real world, that reason is our means of knowledge, and that human well-being in this life is
Ayn Rand criticized both the “liberal” Left and the “conservative” Right poles of American politics. She identified both major political
Peter Schartz was not simply referring to the Libertarian party. See his " On Moral Sanctions ," in which he discusses the question "...
Existentialism is not a very unified school of thought. The main existentialists—Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Sartre—disagree
Ayn Rand was a radical thinker, i.e., one who went to the root of long-standing philosophical problems. She was self-consciously opposed to
Question: I would like to know how Objectivism is different from hedonism, at least as far as morality is concerned. They seem very similar
The big influences on Hamilton were the economists he read and also the philosophers of natural law and English constitutional law....
To my knowledge, Ayn Rand came somewhat independently to her own views. She may have imbibed Paine second-hand through such Old-Right